Public Trust and the Service-Participation Gap in Digital Government: Evidence from Kendari, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v7i2.837Keywords:
Digital Government, Digital Participation, Public Trust, Local GovernanceAbstract
Digital government is expected to support efficient service delivery and participatory government–citizen relations. This study examines service quality, public trust, user satisfaction, and digital participation among users of digital government services in Kendari City, Indonesia, and considers their implications for partnership-oriented local governance in relation to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Targets 17.16 and 17.17. A cross-sectional survey of 213 purposively selected users was analysed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, Pearson correlations, multiple linear regression, and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Service quality (M = 3.81), public trust (M = 3.91), and user satisfaction (M = 4.08) were rated more positively than digital participation (M = 3.29), while digital feedback received the lowest item score (M = 2.59). Digital participation was positively correlated with all three predictors. The regression model was significant, F(3, 209) = 7.160, p < .001, explaining 9.3% of the variance in participation. Public trust showed a significant positive association with participation (β = .198, p = .005), whereas service quality was not significant and user satisfaction was at the conventional significance boundary. Participation did not differ significantly across age or educational groups. The findings reveal a service-participation gap: favourable service experiences do not automatically translate into active citizen input. Digital participation may therefore provide a foundation for partnership-oriented local governance, but not direct evidence of multi-stakeholder partnerships or SDG achievement.
References
AlAwadhi, S., & Morris, A. (2008). The use of the UTAUT model in the adoption of e-government services in Kuwait. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), 219–219. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.452
Alguliyev, R., Yusifov, F., & Gurbanli, A. (2018). Methodology and criteria for evaluating e-services: the case of Azerbaijan. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 10(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v10i1.493
Arshad, S., & Khurram, S. (2020). Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101486
Atique, M., Htay, S. S., Mumtaz, M., Khan, N. U., & Altalbe, A. (2024). An analysis of E-governance in Pakistan from the lens of the Chinese governance model. Heliyon, 10(5), e27003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27003
Bulmer, E., & del Prado-Higuera, C. (2023). Working together towards sustainable development; is it an easy task? Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration, 8(4), 729–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-023-00421-y
Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., Pachón, J. R. C., & Cegarra, J. L. M. (2012). E-government and citizen’s engagement with local affairs through e-websites: The case of Spanish municipalities. International Journal of Information Management, 32(5), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.02.008
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dečman, M. (2019). Understanding technology acceptance of government information systems from employees’ perspective. In Open Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (Vols. 3–4, pp. 1488–1507). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9860-2.ch070
Dioses, L., Tupia, M., & Bruzza, M. (2021). State-of-art for accessibility measurement in electronic government services for people with visual disabilities. In R. Álvaro, G. Ramiro, P. Francisco García, & M. José (Eds.), 2021 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI52073.2021.9476618
Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital transformation and social inclusion in public services: a qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustainable governance. Sustainability, 17(7), 2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072908
ElMassah, S., & Mohieldin, M. (2020). Digital transformation and localizing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Ecological Economics, 169, 106490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106490
Faller, N. L. (2025). Analysis on political, Social, and technical characteristics of e-governance in Eastern Visayas, Philippines. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i12.3300
Fedorova, S., & Malceva, D. (2017). New Trends in e-government. Proceedings of the International Conference IMS-2017, IMS2017, 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1145/3143699.3143703
Galushi, L. T., & Malatji, T. L. (2022). Digital public administration and inclusive governance at the South African local government, in depth analysis of e-government and service delivery in Musina local municipality. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(6), 116. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0154
Galvez, D. P. C., & Revinova, S. (2025). Assessing digital technology development in Latin American countries: Challenges, drivers, and future Directions. Digital, 5(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital5020020
Gwaka, L. T. (2025). Digital discourses: Exploring city-citizen engagement through city twitter handles in South Africa. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251328040
Idoughi, D., & Abdelhakim, D. (2018). Developing countries e-government services evaluation identifying and testing antecedents of satisfaction case of Algeria. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 14(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2018010104
Jameel, A., Asif, M., Hussain, A., Hwang, J., Sahito, N., & Bukhari, M. H. (2019). Assessing the moderating effect of corruption on the e-government and trust relationship: An evidence of an emerging economy. Sustainability, 11(23), 6540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236540
Jibladze, M., Manvelidze, I., Zoidze, I., & Phartenadze, G. (2024). E-governance under the framework of open governance in Georgia: current situation, problems and opportunities. Public Administration and Policy, 27(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-05-2023-0074
Jimoh, A. L. (2026). Online service quality and civic engagement in Ilorin West, Nigeria: the mediating role of e-government communication experience. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 24(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2025-0090
Kampira, A., & Mukonza, R. M. (2025). E-Government/AI integration state and capacity in developing countries: a systematic review. Administrative Sciences, 15(12), 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15120482
Kementerian PANRB. (2024). Indeks SPBE Nasional meningkat, menteri rini: Penguatan integrasi pelayanan publik berbasis digital. Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi. https://jdih.menpan.go.id/dokumen-hukum/keputusan-menteri-pendayagunaan-aparatur-negara-dan-reformasi-birokrasi-nomor-663-tahun-2024-tentang-1972
Kibria, M. G., & Hong, P. (2024). E-government in Asian countries: a conceptual framework for sustainable development. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(4), 616–637. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2023-0003
Kosherbayeva, A., & Kylbayev, Y. (2025). Kazakhstan’s Digital Governance Evolution: Strategies, Challenges, and Future Prospects. In Public Administration, Governance and Globalization (Vol. 6, pp. 235–262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-00514-4_13
La Tarifu, Taufik, & Nani Eka Pertiwi. (2022). Efektivitas pemanfaatan website pemerintah kota kendari sebagai media informasi puBLIK. Journal Publicuho, 5(3), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i3.21
Lee-Geiller, S., & Lee, T. (David). (2022). How does digital governance contribute to effective crisis management? a case study of Korea’s response to COVID-19. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(4), 860–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2054434
Li, Y., & Li, G. (2022). The Impacts of digital literacy on citizen civic engagement—evidence from China. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 3(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532785
Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2020). Service quality, perceived value, and citizens’ continuous-use intention regarding e-government: Empirical evidence from China. Information & Management, 57(3), 103197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103197
Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
Loka, D. M., Akhyar Abdullah, & Sudirman, F. A. (2022). Identifikasi pelayanan publik berbasis e-government pemerintah kota Kendari pada masa new normal. NeoRespublica: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.52423/neores.v4i1.51
Luo, C., Hasan, N. A. M., & Zamri bin Ahmad, A. M. (2024). Exploring satisfaction and trust as key drivers of e-government continuance intention: evidence from China for Sustainable Digital Governance. Sustainability, 16(24), 11068. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411068
Marcovecchio, I., Thinyane, M., Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2019). Digital Government as implementation means for Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 6(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.2019070101
Mensah, I. K., Luo, C., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2021). Citizen use of e-government services websites. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 17(2), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2021040102
Mwangi, S. C. (2021). A Survey of civic engagement tools and capabilities of city and county government web sites. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 11(4), e202123. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/11255
Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., Casteleyn, S., & Irani, Z. (2019). Continuous usage of e-participation: The role of the sense of virtual community. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.009
Onyango, G., & Ondiek, J. O. (2021). Digitalization and integration of Sustainable Development Goals (SGDs) in public organizations in Kenya. Public Organization Review, 21(3), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00504-2
Osah, J., & Khene, C. (2018). Group structural elements in e-Government strategy formulation at local municipal level in South Africa. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(1), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-06-2017-0033
Patergiannaki, Z., & Pollalis, Y. A. (2024). E-government quality from the citizen’s perspective: the role of perceived factors, demographic variables and the digital divide. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 37(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2023-0229
Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2016). Transnational multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Conditions for success. Ambio, 45(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0684-2
Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Le, M. T. T., & Nguyen, N. L. (2023). E-government service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: evidence from a newly emerging country. Journal of Public Policy, 43(4), 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X23000296
Ramadimetjar, J., Kabanda, S., & Agangiba, M. (2024). Experiences of visually impaired South African government employees with e-government services. In C. Wallace, K. Salah, & S. Lisa F (Eds.), IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 708, pp. 48–61). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66982-8_4
Ramdani, W. N. R., Nasir, M., & Sudirman, F. A. (2021). Implementasi aplikasi SiCANTIK pada Dinas PMPTSP Kota Kendari : Tinjauan e-government. PAMARENDA : Public Administration and Government Journal, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.52423/pamarenda.v1i1.19305
Rodrigues, J. de L., Gomes, S. C., & Borges, F. Q. (2021). Electronic participation via Facebook: the potential from Brazilian municipalities. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(4), 442–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-06-2019-0049
Saldanha, D. M. F., Dias, C. N., & Guillaumon, S. (2022). Transparency and accountability in digital public services: Learning from the Brazilian cases. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101680
Sanina, A., Styrin, E., Vigoda-Gadot, E., Yudina, M., & Semenova, A. (2024). Digital government transformation and Sustainable Development Goals: To What Extent Are They Interconnected? Bibliometric Analysis Results. Sustainability, 16(22), 9761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229761
Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
Shin, B., Floch, J., Rask, M., Bæck, P., Edgar, C., Berditchevskaia, A., Mesure, P., & Branlat, M. (2024). A systematic analysis of digital tools for citizen participation. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101954
Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., Stigson, B., Shrivastava, P., Leach, M., & O’Connell, D. (2017). Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3
Suradi, A., Purnomo, H. D., & Hendry, . (2026). A user-centred e-government service design framework to enhance public trust in sustainable policies. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 16(1), 31852–31862. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.14851
Taufiqurokhman, T., Satispi, E., Andriansyah, A., Murod, M., & Sulastri, E. (2024). The impact of e-service quality on public trust and public satisfaction in e-government public services. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(2), 765–772. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.1.002
Thi Uyen Nguyen, T., Van Nguyen, P., Thi Ngoc Huynh, H., Truong, G. Q., & Do, L. (2024). Unlocking e-government adoption: Exploring the role of perceived usefulness, ease of use, trust, and social media engagement in Vietnam. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100291
Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K., & McNeal, R. (2008). Institutions, policy innovation, and e‐government in the American States. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
Umar, A., Mudey, M. H., Manaf, H. A., & JiFang, C. (2026). The role of user expectations and computer self-efficacy in enhancing e-government utilization: Implications for public service delivery. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(8), 2026403. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026403
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024). E-Government Survey 2024 Accelerating Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development With the addendum on Artificial Intelligence. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/reports/un-e-government-survey-2024
Usas, A., & Streimikiene, D. (2025). Sustainability in the digital era: Exploring the role of public websites. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 28(4), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2025-4-002
Wirata, G., Gunawan, M. S., Judijanto, L., Sarmento, A. de A., & Permono, A. R. (2025). The Role of e-government innovation in enhancing public service performance and strengthening transparent governance. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 12(6), 710–717. https://doi.org/10.14419/zxpzp606
Wirtz, B. W., & Piehler, R. (2016). eGovernment applications and public personnel acceptance: an empirical analysis of the public servant perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.1003384
Zeebaree, M., Agoyi, M., & Aqel, M. (2022). Sustainable adoption of e-government from the UTAUT perspective. Sustainability, 14(9), 5370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095370
Zhang, H., & Pi, Y. (2014). Analysis of the impact of cloud computing technology to e-government performance evaluation. 2014 9th International Conference on Computer Science & Education, 582–585. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2014.6926529
Zhao, B., Cheng, S., Schiff, K. J., & Kim, Y. (2023). Digital transparency and citizen participation: Evidence from the online crowdsourcing platform of the City of Sacramento. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101868
Zubir, M. H. H., & Abdul Latip, M. S. (2024). Factors affecting citizens’ intention to use e-government services: assessing the mediating effect of perceived usefulness and ease of use. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(3), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-04-2023-0040
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Faturachman Alputra Sudirman, Saidin Saidin, Asriani Asriani, Marlina Rajab
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find rights and licences in Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy. By submitting articles or article manuscripts, the author agrees to this policy. No special documents are required.
1. Licence
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA).
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons licence, Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy for distributing works in journal and other media of publication.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he or she has been authorised by all co-authors to agree on this copyright and licence notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his or her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open-access journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons licence term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy will publish the article (or have it published) if the editorial process is successfully completed and the Journal or its sublicensee is obliged to proceed with its publication. The Journal also reserves the right to conform the article to its preferred style of punctuation, spelling, capitalisation, and usage.
